The Board ruled against you. That is not the end.
A Workers’ Compensation Law Judge decision can be appealed to a three-member panel of the Workers’ Compensation Board, and panel decisions can be appealed to a Full Board of seven members, and from there to the Appellate Division, Third Department. Each level has strict deadlines and filing rules. Missing one forfeits the appeal.

Three levels of appeal — and the deadlines that control each one.
Level one: appeal to a Workers’ Compensation Board panel. Under § 23 of the WC Law, any party can appeal a WCLJ decision within 30 days of receiving written notice of the decision. The application for review (Form RB-89) must be filed electronically through the Board’s web portal. The panel — three Board members — reviews the written record only; there is no new testimony at this stage. The panel can affirm, modify, or reverse the WCLJ decision.
Level two: Full Board appeal. If the panel rules against you, you have 30 days to request a Full Board review — all seven Board members reconsider the case. Full Board review is discretionary; the Board can decline to hear it. If they accept and issue a decision, that decision is entitled to greater precedential weight and is harder to overturn on further appeal.
Level three: Appellate Division, Third Department. After exhausting Board-level appeals, a party can appeal to the Third Department under CPLR Article 78. The court reviews whether the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence in the record. The Third Department does not re-weigh medical opinion; it asks only whether a rational Board could have reached that conclusion. Reversals happen — but they require skilled appellate briefing and a clear error of law.
What you need to know
Plain-English answers to the questions that come up most often on these cases.
WCB Hearing Process
What happens at a hearing before a WCLJ.
Read moreReduced Earnings Benefits
Partial disability benefits during the appeal period.
Read moreHow Long Benefits Last
Whether benefits continue while an appeal is pending.
Read moreWhat Is Section 32
Settling instead of appealing — the trade-offs.
Read moreEmployer Denies Work-Related Injury
Fighting a factual denial at the WCLJ level.
Read morePermanent Partial Disability
Challenging an SLU rating on appeal.
Read moreHow we handle these cases
We file the RB-89 within 30 days
We track every WCLJ decision date and file the application for Board review within the 30-day window under § 23 — even when the decision arrives by mail and the client does not contact us until day 25.
We identify the strongest grounds for reversal
Board panels reverse WCLJ decisions most often when the Judge ignored uncontroverted medical evidence, applied the wrong legal standard, or made findings not supported by the record. We identify these issues and build the RB-89 around them.
We protect benefits during the appeal
An appeal does not automatically pause your weekly benefit. We move to continue indemnity payments during the review period and oppose carrier applications to suspend benefits while their appeal is pending.
We prepare Full Board briefs when needed
Full Board review requires a persuasive written brief arguing that the panel decision is contrary to law or established Board precedent. We write those briefs with citations to Board decisions and relevant Appellate Division authority.
We evaluate settlement during the appeal
Sometimes a Section 32 settlement during an appeal makes more sense than waiting 12 to 18 months for a panel decision. We run the math on both paths and give you an honest comparison before you decide.
Real cases. Real results.
Three recent Workers’ Compensation outcomes — case context and result. No client identifying information.
WCLJ reduced our client to zero indemnity based on an IME. Panel reversed, finding the IME doctor’s opinion contradicted by objective test results, and ordered back-payment of 14 weeks of suspended benefits.
Panel affirmed a low SLU rating. We requested Full Board review, citing conflicting WCLJ findings from the same carrier’s IME doctor in a prior case. Full Board doubled the rating.
Carrier appealed a favorable Full Board decision to the Appellate Division. We briefed substantial-evidence support for every finding. Third Department affirmed in a memorandum decision.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is evaluated on its own facts. The case outcomes shown are representative examples; details have been altered or generalized to protect client confidentiality.
Related questions
Quick answers from our FAQ library.
Other ways we help
Same firm, same approach — different practice areas under one roof.
Social Security Disability
Can’t work due to a disability. SSDI & SSI claims, denials, appeals.
Learn more →Long-Term Disability
Private LTD insurance denied or cut off. ERISA appeals.
Learn more →Personal Injury
Car accident. Construction site. Scaffold Law.
Learn more →Workers’ Rights
Retaliation, wage theft, harassment. Plaintiff-side only.
Learn more →Workers’ Compensation lawyers near you
Seven New York offices serving working clients across the state.
The attorneys who work your case
Not a call centre. The lawyer who signs you is the lawyer who shows up.
Need a workers' compensation lawyer?
Free consultation. No fee unless we win. English or Spanish. Day or night.




