A Denial Letter Is Not the End. But the 180-Day Deadline Is
Why the Administrative Appeal Is the Most Critical Stage of Your Claim
Under 29 CFR 2560.503-1, ERISA plans must give claimants a full and fair review of any adverse benefit determination. That review happens before you ever reach federal court. Here is the problem: whatever evidence you submit — or fail to submit — during the appeal becomes the administrative record. In most ERISA cases, a federal judge cannot consider anything that was not in that record. There is no discovery. There is no trial. There is no second chance to introduce a treating physician’s opinion you did not include. Getting the appeal right the first time is everything.
What you need to know
Plain-English answers to the questions that come up most often on these cases.
The 180-Day Appeal Deadline
ERISA mandates at least 180 days to file a voluntary appeal after an adverse determination. Some plans are more generous, but none are shorter. The clock starts on the denial date — not when you receive the letter, not when you retain an attorney.
Read moreBuilding the Administrative Record
The appeal is not simply a letter disagreeing with the insurer. It is the submission of every piece of evidence that supports your claim: updated medical records, treating physician statements, functional capacity evaluations, vocational expert reports, and responses to every reason cited in the denial letter.
Read moreThe Abuse-of-Discretion Standard
If the plan document grants the insurer discretionary authority to interpret the plan, federal courts review the decision under an abuse-of-discretion standard — not de novo. That means the insurer wins if its decision was merely reasonable, even if the judge would have decided differently. Building an overwhelming record on appeal is the best defense against this deferential standard.
Read moreConflict of Interest
When the same company both funds the plan and decides claims, a structural conflict of interest exists. Under Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Glenn, 554 U.S. 105 (2008), courts must weigh that conflict. Documenting the insurer’s pattern of behavior during the administrative process strengthens this argument in federal court.
Read moreVoluntary vs. Mandatory Appeals
Some ERISA plans offer voluntary appeal levels beyond the first mandatory appeal. Accepting a voluntary appeal is optional — and declining it does not waive your right to sue. Choosing whether to pursue an additional round of internal review is a strategic decision that depends on the facts of your case.
Read moreExhaustion of Administrative Remedies
Federal courts require ERISA claimants to exhaust internal appeal remedies before filing suit. Skipping the administrative appeal — even if it seems futile — typically bars your federal court claim. The process must be followed precisely.
Read moreHow we handle these cases
Step 1
Request the complete claim file and all plan documents under 29 CFR 2560.503-1 within days of retention.
Step 2
Identify every basis cited in the denial letter and assemble specific rebuttal evidence for each.
Step 3
Commission independent medical reviews and vocational expert opinions to counter insurer-hired reviewers.
Step 4
Draft a comprehensive appeal brief that protects the record for federal court if the appeal is denied.
Step 5
Track the 180-day deadline precisely and calendar all intermediate submission windows.
Real cases. Real results.
Three recent Long-Term Disability outcomes — case context and result. No client identifying information.
An insurance company denied a financial analyst’s claim, citing a lack of objective medical evidence. We obtained an independent neuropsychological evaluation and a functional capacity evaluation, submitted a detailed appeal brief, and the claim was approved before reaching federal court.
When an initial appeal was denied despite strong evidence, we ensured the administrative record was complete with every expert opinion and medical record needed. The insurer settled the case shortly after we filed in federal court, avoiding trial.
By documenting the insurer’s pattern of ignoring treating physician opinions in favor of file-review doctors who never examined the claimant, we built a conflict-of-interest argument that the district court found persuasive in overturning the denial.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is evaluated on its own facts. The case outcomes shown are representative examples; details have been altered or generalized to protect client confidentiality.
Related questions
Quick answers from our FAQ library.
Other ways we help
Same firm, same approach — different practice areas under one roof.
Workers’ Compensation
Injured at work. Lost wages. Denied benefits.
Learn more →Social Security Disability
Can’t work due to a disability. SSDI & SSI claims, denials, appeals.
Learn more →Personal Injury
Car accident. Construction site. Scaffold Law.
Learn more →Workers’ Rights
Retaliation, wage theft, harassment. Plaintiff-side only.
Learn more →Long-Term Disability lawyers near you
Seven New York offices serving working clients across the state.
The attorneys who work your case
Not a call centre. The lawyer who signs you is the lawyer who shows up.
Brian M. Mittman, Esq.
Managing Partner · Markhoff & Mittman, P.C.
Call 866-205-2415 Schedule with Brian- Admitted in New York
- 30+ years in practice
- Attends Board hearings personally
Brian has personally handled New York workers' compensation, SSDI, and personal-injury cases for over three decades. Your case is never handed off to a paralegal.
- Admitted in New York and New Jersey
- Pace University School of Law, J.D.
- Litigates before the Workers' Compensation Board
Randy has litigated every type of claim before the Workers' Compensation Board on behalf of hundreds of claimants.
- Admitted in New York, 2008
- New York Law School, J.D. 2007
- With The Disability Guys since 2013
Benai has spent more than a decade fighting for injured workers before the Workers' Compensation Board and the New York State Employees' Retirement Board.
Need a long-term disability lawyer?
Free consultation. No fee unless we win. English or Spanish. Day or night.