Skip to main content
Long-Term Disability FAQs

If You Have an Open LTD Claim, Assume You Are Being Watched.

Quick Answer
Disability insurers routinely hire investigators to conduct physical surveillance and monitor social media accounts. A single photograph taken on a good day — out of context — can become the centerpiece of a termination letter. Know the rules.
Call 866-205-2415 Available 24/7 Hablamos Español Free consultation
Brian M. Mittman, Esq., Managing Partner at Markhoff & Mittman, P.C.
About Surveillance and Social Media

Surveillance Is Standard Practice in LTD Claims

Long-term disability insurers have dedicated special investigation units whose sole purpose is finding inconsistencies between what claimants report and what they observe. Physical surveillance — investigators parked outside your home with cameras — is common. Social media monitoring is equally routine. A LinkedIn post showing you at a conference, a Facebook photo at a family event, or an Instagram story from a vacation can be interpreted as evidence you are not as limited as you claim. These images are taken on your best days, stripped of the days you spent in bed recovering afterward. The insurer does not show both sides. We do.

Key Topics

What you need to know

Plain-English answers to the questions that come up most often on these cases.

Physical Surveillance

Investigators may observe and film you at your home, during errands, at medical appointments, or at social events. In New York, surveillance in public spaces is legal. The resulting footage is edited, often selectively, and placed in your claim file. Courts have upheld terminations based on surveillance footage — and overturned them when the footage was shown to be misleading.

Read more

Social Media as Evidence

Public profiles are fair game. Even private accounts can be accessed through mutual connections or legal process in litigation. The practical advice is simple: do not post photographs or commentary that contradicts your documented limitations. Do not delete existing posts — that could constitute spoliation. Talk to your attorney first.

Read more

Context Is Everything — and Insurers Strip It

Most disabilities are not constant. A claimant with chronic pain may walk to the mailbox one day and be bedridden for three days afterward. Surveillance captures the walk, not the aftermath. Documenting your bad days — in a symptom journal, through treating physician notes, through family statements — creates context that the surveillance report ignores.

Read more

Symptom Journals and Activity Logs

A contemporaneous daily log of your symptoms and functional capacity is one of the most underused tools in LTD litigation. It creates a record of variability that surveillance cannot refute. It also demonstrates self-awareness and consistency when cross-referenced against medical records.

Read more

Surveillance During the Appeal Process

Surveillance does not stop after a denial. If you file an appeal, the insurer may continue monitoring you throughout the administrative review period. Evidence gathered after the denial can be introduced during the appeal and placed in the administrative record.

Read more

What to Do If You Suspect You Are Being Followed

Do not confront an investigator. Do not alter your normal activity out of anxiety — sudden changes in behavior look suspicious. Continue to live within your actual limitations, document your symptoms consistently, and call your attorney to discuss what has been observed.

Read more
How We Handle It

How we handle these cases

1

Step 1

Counsel clients on social media conduct and documentation from the first day of representation.

2

Step 2

Establish a symptom journal process to create a contemporaneous record of good days and bad days.

3

Step 3

Obtain any surveillance evidence in the claim file through the plan document request under 29 CFR 2560.503-1.

4

Step 4

Challenge surveillance footage in the appeal by providing medical and lay evidence of symptom variability.

5

Step 5

Depose surveillance investigators in federal litigation when footage has been selectively edited.

Case Results

Real cases. Real results.

Three recent Long-Term Disability outcomes — case context and result. No client identifying information.

Surveillance and Social Media
Surveillance-Based Termination Reversed

An insurer terminated a claimant’s benefits based on video footage showing him carrying grocery bags. We submitted medical evidence documenting his activity intolerance, a detailed treating physician statement, and a family declaration describing the recovery period that followed. The termination was reversed on appeal.

Surveillance and Social Media
Social Media Evidence Contextualized

An insurer cited LinkedIn activity — including a professional post — as evidence a claimant could work. We established that the post was written on a rare good day and that cognitive tasks of that complexity were not sustainable over a workday or workweek. The denial was overturned.

Surveillance and Social Media
Selective Editing Exposed in Federal Court

During ERISA litigation, we identified that the surveillance footage submitted was a 12-minute clip from a multi-day investigation. The missing footage showed significant functional limitation. The district court found the selective submission undermined the insurer’s credibility.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is evaluated on its own facts. The case outcomes shown are representative examples; details have been altered or generalized to protect client confidentiality.

Reviewed by Brian M. Mittman, Esq.
Managing Partner · Markhoff & Mittman, P.C. · Admitted in New York

Brian Mittman has personally handled New York workers’ compensation, SSDI, LTD, and personal injury cases for over three decades.

Last reviewed: May 14, 2026
Your Legal Team

The attorneys who work your case

Not a call centre. The lawyer who signs you is the lawyer who shows up.

  • Brian M. Mittman, Esq.

    Brian M. Mittman, Esq.

    Managing Partner · Markhoff & Mittman, P.C.

    Call 866-205-2415 Schedule with Brian
    • Admitted in New York
    • 30+ years in practice
    • Attends Board hearings personally

    Brian has personally handled New York workers' compensation, SSDI, and personal-injury cases for over three decades. Your case is never handed off to a paralegal.

    Full bio & credentials →

  • Randy Jacobs, Esq.

    Randy Jacobs, Esq.

    Attorney · Markhoff & Mittman, P.C.

    Call 866-205-2415 Schedule with Randy
    • Admitted in New York and New Jersey
    • Pace University School of Law, J.D.
    • Litigates before the Workers' Compensation Board

    Randy has litigated every type of claim before the Workers' Compensation Board on behalf of hundreds of claimants.

    Full bio & credentials →

  • Benai Lifshitz, Esq.

    Benai Lifshitz, Esq.

    Attorney · Markhoff & Mittman, P.C.

    Call 866-205-2415 Schedule with Benai
    • Admitted in New York, 2008
    • New York Law School, J.D. 2007
    • With The Disability Guys since 2013

    Benai has spent more than a decade fighting for injured workers before the Workers' Compensation Board and the New York State Employees' Retirement Board.

    Full bio & credentials →

Need a long-term disability lawyer?

Free consultation. No fee unless we win. English or Spanish. Day or night.